Pakistan's Heritage Digital Ecosystem · Umbrella hub

Policy, law and intelligence for Pakistan's heritage

The operational centre of the ecosystem: national heritage policy, legal and regulatory compliance, Heritage Impact Assessment, climate and disaster resilience, public advocacy — and the Heritage Intelligence engine that grounds all of it in evidence.

Pakistan heritage

One ecosystem, four instruments

Each domain carries one duty, and every record is joined by a single key — the Atlas Site ID. Any site can be resolved on any domain at /site/{id}.

pak-heritage.forum — this hub

Policy, advocacy, law, HIA, climate resilience and the Intelligence engine. The command centre.

pwhi.digital — World Heritage portal

UNESCO World Heritage in all four categories: cultural, natural, mixed and intangible. Committee monitoring, SOC tracking, Taxila and Rohtas Watch.

pak-heritage.site — Spatial Atlas & guide

The 6,200-record national inventory: GIS map, filters, per-site records — growing into a curated touristic guide with heritage trails.

pak-heritage.pics — Visual conservation database

Time-series photographic archive: condition monitoring, then-and-now comparisons, verified field submissions tagged to Site IDs.

The five pillars of this hub

Heritage Intelligence engine

Evidence-grounded research over 6,921 indexed items — the national registry, 122 UNESCO Committee decisions and 20 statutes. Cites its sources; abstains when the record cannot answer.

Legal & regulatory compliance

The Legislative Matrix: auditing the Antiquities Act 1975 and provincial statutes, monitoring gazette notifications and enforcement practice.

Heritage & spatial impact assessment

Project-level HIA for infrastructure interventions and spatial screening of urbanisation and zoning pressure on catalogued sites.

Climate & disaster risk · in preparation

Flood vulnerability, water-table threat, extreme heat and emergency mitigation planning for heritage places — the resilience framework of the ecosystem.

Advocacy & public media

Policy briefs, the Ground Truth census, Taxila and Rohtas Watch campaigns, expert analysis and research publications.

Moderated deliberation · opening soon

Site-linked expert and public discussion — evidence over opinion, with moderation, labelling and appeals. The consultations below open first.

The editorial pillars currently publish on pwhi.digital and are being consolidated under this hub; existing addresses will redirect when the move completes.

The national protection gap — the evidence this hub acts on

Beyond the inscribed and tentative properties, PWHI maintains a structured inventory of roughly 6,200 catalogued heritage places. (PWHI analysis on PWHI data, verified against the master registry, July 2026.)

6,200
Catalogued places
684
With legal protection
5,516
Not protected (~89.0%)

Protection attributed to the Antiquities Act 1975 (390), the Punjab Special Premises (Preservation) Ordinance 1985 (226), the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Antiquities Act 2016 (25), the AJK antiquities law (24), the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act 1994 (8), the Punjab Heritage Foundation Act 2005 (6), Karachi Building & Town Planning Regulations (2), the Quaid-i-Azam’s Mazar Ordinance (1) and 2 recorded only as “protected”. Protection status is treated as unverified for any site unless an identifiable statute or gazette notification is confirmed.

The first consultations that will open

Why heritage is invisible in Pakistan's public agenda

Policy — province counts and protection gaps in planning and budgets.

Protected on paper, neglected on ground

Law & protection — what enforcement actually looks like locally.

District-level heritage neglect

Local government — capacity in the districts that hold the most sites.

Photography as evidence of decay

Media & advocacy — citizen documentation of threat, done responsibly.

World Heritage vs everyday heritage

UNESCO & beyond — six properties on the List; thousands beyond it.

Civil society role vs bureaucracy

Governance — independent monitoring and open data without a parallel bureaucracy.

How contributions will be handled

Contribution → community rules → moderation → labelled as opinion / evidence / PWHI position → published or referred

Moderation comes first: nothing is published without review, and unverified material is never presented as established fact.

Ask Heritage Intelligence Explore the Atlas World Heritage portal